Grass Lake (sphagnum fen) is included in the Threshold Dashboard. Threshold Indicators are evaluated against Threshold Standards every 4 years. Thresholds are environmental goals and standards for the Lake Tahoe Basin that indirectly define the capacity of the Region to accommodate additional land development.

Status

grass lake chart.png
Change in the number of hectares occupied by Sphagnum spp. and Meesia triquetra by cover class at Grass Lake in 2004, 2009 and 2010. Cover classes: Dominant = 50 to 100 percent cover, Intermediate = 5 to 50 percent cover. Source: U.S. Forest Service, LTBMU.

Evaluation Map

Grass lake map.jpg

Map showing location of Grass Lake and surrounding area.

2015 Evaluation

Status
Insufficient Data to Determine Status or No Target Established
Trend
Insufficient Data to Determine Trend
Confidence
Low
View Evaluation

Applicable Standard

Provide for the nondegradation of the natural qualities of any plant community that is uncommon to the Basin or of exceptional scientific, ecological, or scenic value. This threshold shall apply but not be limited to 2) Grass Lake (sphagnum fen),

Key Points

No Key Points

About the Threshold

Grass Lake lies within the Upper Truckee Critical Aquatic Refuge (CAR; a U.S. Forest Service designation) on the southern boundary of the Lake Tahoe Region. It was established as a U.S. Forest Service Research Natural Area (RNA) in 1991. Grass Lake is roughly 250 acres in size and has long been considered the largest and best example of a Sphagnum fen in the Sierra Nevada (Bittman 1985). Sphagnum fens are peat-forming wetlands that form when stable hydric soils allow a rate of organic matter production that is greater than the rate of decomposition, which over millennia leads to an accumulation of peat (Patterson and Cooper 2007, Weixelman and Cooper 2009). In environments with low summer precipitation like the Sierra Nevada, fens are sustained by groundwater input rather than precipitation. They are important sites of groundwater discharge and may serve as indicators of shallow aquifers (Cooper 1990).The conditions required for fens are very limited in mountain ecosystems, and fens occupy only 0.1 to 0.2 percent of the landscape in the Sierra Nevada (Wolf and Cooper 2015). Because fens form slowly over thousands of years, they are not easily restored once destroyed (Cooper et al. 1998) and they provide an important record of prehistoric climate and vegetation (Wolf and Cooper 2015). Fens have been identified by the U.S. Forest Service (SNEP 1996) and in the Tahoe Science Plan (Manley et al. 2010a) as among the most sensitive habitat types in the Sierra Nevada. Fens are hotspots of biodiversity that support rare plants, insects, and animals. Vegetation in all wetland types, including fens, marshes and meadows, plays an important role in recycling nutrients, trapping eroding soil, and filtering out pollutants such as nitrates (Cooper and Wolf 2006). In addition, fens figure prominently in nearly all scenarios of carbon dioxide-induced global climate change because they are major sinks for atmospheric carbon (Chimner and Cooper 2002). In the 2010 Lake Tahoe Region Fen Assessment, Grass Lake received the highest conservation significance rank of any fen in the Lake Tahoe Region with a score of 30 out of 40 (Sikes et al. 2011). Elements that contributed to the high ranking include its large size, its status as a Natural Research Area, the presence of rare plants and vegetation associations, high species diversity, low levels of disturbance, and a high likelihood of persistence. This high score combined with a qualitative assessment of management and recreation led to a rating of “at or better than target” in 2012 (TRPA 2012).
Any event or activity that disturbs the hydrologic regime or nutrient levels of a fen or causes drying or changes in plant composition is a threat to the function of that fen (Patterson and Cooper 2007, Weixelman and Cooper 2009). Activities in general that threaten fens in the Sierra Nevada include timber harvest, mechanical fuel reduction treatments, road and trail construction, livestock trampling, off-road vehicles, ground and surface water pumping, and water pollution (Cooper and Wolf 2006). All are regulated and managed in the Tahoe Region, and the RNA status protects Grass Lake from these activities. Recreational use is light, and the impacts from cross-country skiing in the winter are likely to be negligible. Runoff from State Route 89 has likely been a source of water pollution, but recent road improvements for stormwater management were designed to divert surface road flow away from Grass Lake. Hydrologic change, which will likely be exacerbated by climate change, is predicted to be the largest threat to the Grass Lake community (Christensen 2013). Recent California based climate models predict a nine-degree Fahrenheit increase in temperature by 2100, and more conservative models predict a two- to four-degree Fahrenheit increase in winter and four- to eight-degree increase in summer (Safford et al., 2012a). Models are more variable for precipitation, but recent models for the Sierra Nevada predict similar to slightly less precipitation. Most models predict drier summer conditions, since more of the precipitation is predicted to come as rain, and snow melt-off will occur earlier in spring (Hayhoe et al. 2004, Dettinger 2005, Safford et al. 2012, Drexler et al. 2013). In the Lake Tahoe Region, these changes appear to be happening at an accelerated pace (Coats 2010). Snowpack is the dominant source of groundwater recharge (Earman et al. 2006), and since Sierra Nevada fen sustainability depends on groundwater, these climatic changes pose a severe threat (Drexler et al. 2013). Further, Sierra Nevada fens have relatively shallow peat depths, which make them highly susceptible to drying effects from increased temperature and/or reduced moisture (Drexler et al. 2013). Drexler et al. (2013) found that five Sierra Nevada fens had shrunk by 10 to18 percent between 1951 and 2010, while at the same time mean minimum air temperature had increased and snowpack longevity and April 1 snow water equivalent had decreased. Hydrologic monitoring and climate change modeling scenarios show that a rain dominated precipitation regime would likely lead to desaturation of approximately half of Grass Lake, which would cause aerobic decomposition of peat near the fen’s edges and in the western and eastern portions (Christensen 2013). Increasing temperature would accelerate the rate of decomposition.

Delivering and Measuring Success

Rationale Details

Insufficient data to determine status. Although Grass Lake is located near a major state route, the wet conditions and unstable sphagnum substrate deter hikers and cyclists. In addition, the RNA status protects the site from off-road vehicles, grazing, and water diversions. Recreational use is mainly limited to cross-country skiing in the winter. Recent threshold evaluation reports have assessed the status of Grass Lake as in attainment based on qualitative evaluations of recreation impacts and management actions, rather than any direct measurements of factors that contribute to the integrity of the community (TRPA, 2012e, 2007). Moss monitoring plots showed that plots with intermediate Sphagnum spp. (5 to 50 percent cover) decreased between 2009 and 2010 by 30 percent, but plots with high cover (50 to 100 percent) increased. Meesia triquetra was present only at intermediate cover in 2009, and this cover class increased by 31 percent in 2010, and 0.18 hectares was mapped in the high cover class in 2010 (Shana Gross, pers. comm).
Insufficient data to determine trend. No new quantitative data is available since the 2011 Threshold Evaluation Report.

Confidence Details

Low. Where insufficient data is available to determine status the confidence is determined to be low.
Low. Where insufficient data is available to determine trend the confidence is determined to be low.
Low

Additional Figures and Resources

No photos available.


No documents available.